Egocentric-10K vs Ego4D: A Complete Comparison
Egocentric-10K is best for factory robotics. Ego4D fits broad human activity. See a 15-point table, quickstart code, and a fast decision checklist.

Egocentric-10K vs Ego4D: The Short Answer
Building a robot that sees like a person? Pick the dataset that fits your job. Use Egocentric-10K if you need first-person video from real factories. Choose Ego4D if you need diverse, daily-life video across many places and tasks. That's the core trade-off.
At a Glance: 15-Point Comparison
| Metric | Egocentric-10K | Ego4D |
|---|---|---|
| Total hours | ~10,000 hours (reported) | 3,670 hours (official site) |
| Primary setting | Real factories only (Reddit, Threads, LinkedIn) | Daily life, many scenes and activities (Ego4D) |
| Participants | ~2,153 factory workers (reported) | 923 participants (Ego4D) |
| Geography | Factories (locations not listed in sources) | 74 locations, 9 countries (Ego4D) |
| Frames | ~1,080,000,000 frames (reported) | Not stated on site |
| Focus tasks | Industrial hand-object work, manipulation, safety | Many: memory, language queries, interactions |
| Language queries | Not stated | Yes (natural language queries) (Ego4D) |
| Manipulation labels | Evaluation set for manipulation status (Hugging Face) | General interaction tasks; manipulation is broader |
| License / access | Open-source release (as shared in posts); check terms | Request-based access; research community (Ego4D) |
| Scene complexity | Dense, industrial scenes, tools, machines | Very diverse scenes, daily actions, social settings |
| Best for robotics | Yes, especially factory robotics and AR assist | Good for general perception and multimodal tasks |
| Benchmarks | Evaluation task: object manipulation status (Hugging Face) | Multiple benchmarks incl. language queries (Ego4D) |
| Data format | Video; details not stated in sources | Video; rich metadata and tasks (see site) |
| Community | New large open release (Build AI) | International consortium, 88 researchers (Ego4D) |
| Comparable datasets (context) | Industrial specialty vs. older ego datasets (GitHub list) | Daily-life focus; see prior work for scope (UT Ego, HD-EPIC) |
Which Dataset Is Better for Robot Manipulation?
Answer: Egocentric-10K. It's filmed only in real factories, so your model sees true tools, parts, hands, and workflows. That's ideal for robotic arms, task planning, and safety checks. You also get a small but focused evaluation set for manipulation labels on Hugging Face.
Which Dataset Is Better for General Human Activity Understanding?
Answer: Ego4D. It's diverse and global. It includes many participants and places. It also offers language query tasks and other benchmarks. If you study memory, interactions, or broad perception, start with Ego4D.
Why This Comparison Matters
Picking the wrong data slows you down. Training a robot with home videos won't match factory reality. Training a general model only on factory floors won't cover kitchen or street scenes. Match the dataset to the job-to-be-done.
Strengths and Limits
Egocentric-10K: What Stands Out
- Industrial-first. Every clip comes from real factories (source, source, source).
- Scale for robotics. ~10k hours and ~1.08B frames (reported) help models learn hand-object interaction in busy spaces.
- Open access vibes. Shared as open-source in posts; review exact terms when downloading.
Egocentric-10K: Watch Outs
- Narrow domain. Great for factories. Less useful for home, school, or street scenes.
- Annotation depth. Publicly shown evaluation labels focus on manipulation status. Other labels are not stated.
- Specs unknown. Camera, resolution, and exact formats are not detailed in the sources.
Ego4D: What Stands Out
- Diversity. 3,670 hours, 923 people, 74 locations, 9 countries (source).
- Rich tasks. Includes language queries and other benchmarks that push multimodal learning.
- Community support. Backed by an international consortium; widely cited.
Ego4D: Watch Outs
- Not factory-first. If you need machine tools, PPE, and line work, you'll have to filter or fine-tune with industrial add-ons.
- Access process. Data typically requires request and approval. Plan lead time.
- Label fit. Tasks are broad; manipulation details may be less targeted for factory robots.
How to Get Started Fast
Egocentric-10K: Load the Evaluation Set (manipulation)
This public evaluation set helps you test if the camera-wearer is manipulating an object right now.
# Install: pip install datasets pillow
from datasets import load_dataset
ds = load_dataset("builddotai/Egocentric-10K-Evaluation")
print(ds)
example = ds["train"][0]
print(example.keys()) # e.g., 'image', 'label'
print(example["label"]) # 1 if manipulating, else 0
# Show or save an image example
from PIL import Image
img = example["image"]
img.save("sample.jpg")
Source: builddotai/Egocentric-10K-Evaluation.
Ego4D: Access and Explore
- Request access from the Ego4D official site.
- Download approved subsets and read the task docs.
- Start with a small split. Build your loader and sanity-check labels.
# Pseudocode: load local Ego4D videos and sample frames
# (Structure varies by subset and task; see Ego4D docs.)
import cv2, glob
paths = glob.glob("/data/ego4d/videos/*.mp4")
cap = cv2.VideoCapture(paths[0])
ok, frame = cap.read()
if ok:
cv2.imwrite("ego4d_frame.jpg", frame)
cap.release()
Decision Framework: Pick the Right Dataset
Use this checklist to make a clear pick. Score each item from 1 (low need) to 5 (high need).
- Industrial scenes only? If yes, Egocentric-10K wins.
- Global diversity and daily tasks? If yes, Ego4D wins.
- Hand-object manipulation labels now? Egocentric-10K evaluation set helps.
- Language and memory tasks? Ego4D has a language-query benchmark.
- Open-source access vs. request-based? Consider your timeline.
- Compute budget? 10k hours is heavy; plan storage and training time.
- Safety use cases? Factory footage trains hazard spotting better.
- General perception? Ego4D's diversity helps more.
Get the checklist: Copy the bullet list above into your tracker. Add a 1 5 score. Sum per dataset. The highest total is your pick.
Mini Benchmark Ideas
- Robot pick-and-place (factory): Train on Egocentric-10K frames; evaluate with its manipulation labels from the evaluation set.
- State tracking (home/lab): Use Ego4D for object-state queries (via language-task subsets).
- Cross-domain generalization: Pretrain on Ego4D for broad perception; fine-tune on Egocentric-10K for factory skills.
Practical Tips
- Start small. Sample 50 100 videos. Validate labels. Fix loaders first.
- Balance classes. Manipulation vs. non-manipulation can be skewed. Rebalance or reweight.
- Use frame sampling. For long clips, sample key frames around hands and tools to cut cost.
- Track domain drift. Models good at kitchens may fail on conveyor belts. Measure both.
How These Datasets Fit the Egocentric Landscape
Both datasets move the field forward. Ego4D scaled egocentric video beyond prior public sets like UT Ego. New work (for example, HD-EPIC) explores fine-grained labels like hand masks in kitchen scenes. Egocentric-10K brings that scale into factories, which matter for embodied AI and robotics. For a broader view of older sets, see this community list.
FAQs
Is Egocentric-10K really factory-only?
Yes, posts state it's collected only in real factories (Reddit, Threads, LinkedIn).
Where do I find labels for Egocentric-10K?
There is a public evaluation dataset on Hugging Face for manipulation status. Other label types are not listed in the shared sources.
Is Ego4D good for robotics?
It's great for general egocentric perception and multimodal tasks. For factory robots, pair Ego4D pretraining with Egocentric-10K fine-tuning.
Can I mix both datasets?
Yes. Many teams pretrain on diverse data (Ego4D), then fine-tune on domain data (Egocentric-10K).
How does this compare to other datasets?
Older sets like UT Ego are small. Newer work such as HD-EPIC adds fine-grained labels in kitchens. For a survey, check the GitHub list.
Bottom Line
If your job-to-be-done lives on a factory floor, pick Egocentric-10K. If you need broad human activity across many places and tasks, pick Ego4D. When in doubt, pretrain on Ego4D and fine-tune on Egocentric-10K.


